Pre-release Blu-ray impressions roundup

How are they? Decidedly mixed.
While most have reported a shorter loading time than even the post-firmware update HD-A1, a few have had lockups and glitches. While not everyone has been able to get their hands on Blu-ray movies yet, many are reporting a surprisingly poor visual display from former DVD reference star The Fifth Element. Some have even gone as far as to state that Sony's strategy of using MPEG-2 and uncompressed PCM audio on single-layer Blu-ray discs may have required too much video compression, resulting in early releases that don't match the sharpness of VC-1 encoded movies available on HD DVD. Alternatively, kudos have been given for the uncompressed audio, compared to the DD+ 5.1 tracks on HD DVD releases so far,
Meanwhile, most of the world waits until next week (or September, when Pioneer and Sony release their Blu-ray players which reports suggest will have superior hardware), to form their own opinion. If you see any we've missed let us know so we can add them, or if you have one already
Read - Hands-on BD-P1000 First Impressions @ The Man Room
Read - Samsung Blu-ray BD-P1000 First End User Reports @ AVS Forum
Read - Samsung BD-P1000: Blu-ray hands on @ CNet
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
efralope @ Jun 19th 2006 9:32PM
HIDEFDIGEST has 3 reviews up already, and they echo the comments that Blu-Ray isn't up to the level of HD-DVD in terms of visual quality:
http://www.highdefdigest.com/
Even worse is the fact that they are having to partially or completely remove special features. XXX has NO extras at all. HD-DVD releases are loaded with features, porting even the loaded extras from 2-disc DVD Special Editions.
You can find a good summary of the situation by Cliff Stephenson (formerly of DVDFile) at this link to AVS:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=7850079&post7850079
TJ @ Jun 19th 2006 10:13PM
I'm waiting for the Sony player anyway. Looks like a little better construction.
Little worried about what I hear about from the discs themselves. Hopefully that's just a problem with the first round of discs (Like Warner's audio problems on the first three HD DVDs), and not the format as a whole. I'm actually looking forward to getting one of the same Warner title on each format and comparing them myself.
James @ Jun 19th 2006 11:37PM
Don't forget the lack of Dolby Digital + and Dolby True HD.
Though the Terminator would be nice in HD. As would House of Flying Daggers and/or Fifth Element.
jim @ Jun 19th 2006 11:51PM
I just read the 3 reviews above. I'm absolutely stunned. How can Sony be so short-sighted as to release movies that are clearly inferior to HD-DVD? Honestly I was expecting Blu-Ray to equal or surpass HD-DVD in PQ quality. Some movies have no extras? They only thing I can guess is that they are relying on mpeg2 and single layer media. To get the movies to fit on a single disc, they have to compress them. They don't have a second shot at this to get it right. No one is going to spend a grand or more to watch cable-quality HD movies.
With all the *superior* technology like native 1080p and greater disk space they were touting, to mess up like this is almost unforgivable. I thought they were playing from behind a bit already, but with this they will have a much harder time. Honestly it looks as if Blu-Ray has lost the war before it even started. Now I see why they pulled titles and delayed their players again.
WiFiSpy @ Jun 20th 2006 12:39AM
I cant wait to here this weeks Podcast :P
pete @ Jun 20th 2006 5:53AM
Doesn't seem like the Blueray fans' arguement that bigger is better is working out so far.
Mike S @ Jun 20th 2006 6:22AM
$500 more for less quality? Has Sony jumped the Shark?
Jason @ Jun 20th 2006 1:58PM
It would seem that with Sony they see a new technology and try to find a use for it... where as others see a need and use the proper technology to fill the need...
Bruzer @ Jun 20th 2006 7:32PM
I'm going to give this stuff a year to work everything out. By then we should have a good idea where it's all going and who's chasing who.