<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/22/cisco-and-scientific-atlanta/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/22/cisco-and-scientific-atlanta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/22/cisco-and-scientific-atlanta/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't comment on Cisco, but when I heard that Scientific Atlanta was on the block, I thought for sure, Motorola would be the name I'd hear in the end! Purchasing SFA, would have guaranteed Motorola the top spot for years to come in the world of cable boxes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2005 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/22/cisco-and-scientific-atlanta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/22/cisco-and-scientific-atlanta/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad someone finally bought Scientific Atlanta. Their products were ok but a pain to get info from as they "only deal with cable companies". Cisco makes some great products and I would be glad to have them in my equipment rack. I would imagine if Cisco designed a box from the ground up it would be worlds faster and more efficient than the current selection from SA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zelig2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2005 11:14AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>