HD Beat Reader Review: Sony's 50-inch SXRD
Our own Matt Burns gave a review of this set a few weekends ago, but what's better than a reader review? HD Beat reader Thom McCann had a television die on him, so after the funeral, he decided to pick up new Sony SXRD 50-inch set. Thom has plenty of pics and opinions on his purchase, so read on for his full reader-review after the jump!If you have a set that you'd like to create a "reader-review" for, just drop us a note via our Contact Form. If we use your review, you'll see your name in lights for all of the other HD Beat readers to see! We'd give you like prize or something, but hey, presumably you just bought a killer HD set; what the heck more do you need?
"Last weekend my 9 year old Sony Trinitron 34in XBR went kaput! So I was forced to explore my options on a replacement set. I’ve been holding out on HDTV for many reasons including price, resolutions, future compatibility, home space constraints and lack of HD content. I was hoping to get another year or so out of my Trinitron. While I kept somewhat up to date on HD offerings, I was now in a position where I needed to immerse myself in the details.
After a little bit of research and shopping I felt comfortable that HD technology had reached a relatively good price/performance point. More importantly, with the arrival of several HD sets that provided 1080p and HDMI, I felt reasonably assured that these products were relatively future proof. I wanted an HD TV that could handle all of today’s formats and display full HD resolution.
One could easily be overwhelmed when shopping at some of the better HD retailers. There are so many offerings available; traditional CRT, rear projection (DLP), Flat Panel LCD and Plasma. When I started out, I figured I would be looking at DLP based sets since they offer the larger flat screens at a lower price than the plasma or LCD flat panels. They take up less room than the older generation of rear projection systems (or larger CRT TVs) although the do have a bit of bulk. In my research I looked at 1080p systems from Sharp (LCD Flat panel), Sony SXRD (non-DLP rear projection) and DLP sets from Mitsubishi, Toshiba and Samsung. The prices ranged from around $3,000 (DLPs) to $5,000 Sharp LCD flat panel.
I was able to view the Sony SXRD set in a store with high quality input source and the picture was absolutely amazing. There were better pictures from some plasma sets nearby but they were more than double the price. I was not able to see a set with such a good input source as the Sony but I did assume that the others suffered from signal degradation that is somewhat common when shopping for an HD set. The Toshiba was a bit too big for my space at 56 inches. The Mitsubishi set looked good. The Sharp LCD flat panel was tempting and I wanted to give the Samsung a chance.
In the end, I chose the Sony SXRD 50. I didn’t want a monstrously big screen so I thought 50 was the right size. The Sharp 45in LCD flat panel might be a better fit for my space but it’s another grand and the model didn’t have two HDMI ports (although it did have 1 HDMI and 1 DVI). The Sony had a nice form factor with dimensions: 57 1/4" x 34" x 18 7/8, the base is only 38in wide and fit nicely on my existing TV stand. I could just replace my old TV and plug the SXRD into my existing components – although I did buy a new DVD player (Sony DVP-NS70H) to do 720p/1080i.
At 94-pounds, the SXRD 50 was easy to carry and maneuver with two people. The set fit nicely on my existing stand. I picked up my HD DVR set top box from Comcast and some overpriced HDMI and optical cables from Best Buy. I was ready to move into the world of HDTV!
At first I hooked up the cable box to the new TV via component video cables and the new DVD player via HDMI (with optical out to the sound system). When I viewed HD channels with this setup, the picture didn’t look as great as I thought it should. There was some noise. I worked through the Sony menus to adjust the picture to reduce the noise but it still wasn’t perfect. I then switched to the DVI out on the cable box, going into the TV via and HDMI connector cable. The HD channels were outstanding with this setup. I was amazed at the picture clarity and color – and an instant fan of HD TV. I then proceeded to do what every other HD TV owner does; I watched stuff that I had no interest in because it was in HD. The picture is definitely compelling.
The setup of the HD TV was easy to figure out. The back of the Sony TV is very clearly labeled. It has 8 different video inputs besides the TV input. It has 2 composite and S-Video, 2 component video and a PC input via VGA (all with RCA audio in). There are 2 HDMI inputs with one having an additional RCA audio in.
There are also a set of front panel inputs (composite, S-Video, Sony’s iLink (IEEE 1394) port and Memory Stick slot). The SXRD has a cable card slot, but I have it connected via a HD-DVR box from Comcast. The TV also supports Analog audio out and Dolby digital out via optical port. The remote has easy access to a wide range of features when using the TV. With the normal direct cable connection to the TV, I can use the Twin View feature to watch two channels at once. Twin view also supports viewing various video inputs but not the digital inputs. I can change the wide screen format when watching any TV channel or video input. This helps when watching programs in the standard 4:3 format. Of course, watching non-HD programming is not acceptable in full wide screen mode. The picture can be adjusted to cope with this but even in centered 4:3 the picture is a bit blurry and grainy.
The DVD player connected thru HDMI provided a very high quality picture. My old DVD player was non-progressive and connected thru S-Video. The combination of the progressive scan up-converting to 720p/1080i connected to a digital video interface was outstanding. I can’t wait for 1080p content to see the next level.
Football is the reason they invented HD!

The only drawback for me is that the integrated speakers make the set almost 10 inches wider. They are not detachable. It would be nice to remove the speakers since I use a home theater system for the audio. It would also be nice to have some way to know what resolution is currently being shown. With all the various formats, it would be great to compare the difference between the formats and to know when a source is being converted.
At $3999, this set is on the expensive side for a rear projection system. It was $500 more than the equivalent Samsung. If not for the simple fact that it fit on my existing TV stand, then this review might have been about the Samsung HL-R5078W. All in all, the Sony SXRD 50 (it also comes in a 60 inch screen) is an awesome HDTV with a large range of features and high quality screen. I might just keep it." - Thom McCann




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Goose @ Oct 26th 2005 5:47PM
Thanks for the review, i've been interested in this TV for a while and its great to hear owners opinions on it.
However I do want to point out that this TV cannot, through any input, accept a 1080p signal.
Home Theater Dude @ Oct 26th 2005 7:09PM
Great review.
I hate the way the frame/speakers look. Maybe it's different in person, but it looks hacked-together to me.
Am I the only one?
Thom @ Oct 26th 2005 9:08PM
Goose,
I'd like to understand your assertion that this TV can not accept a 1080p signal. What will happen if 1080p signal (when available) comes in thru HDMI? Will it convert it? Will it not show the signal?
Or are you making the point that there are no 1080p sources as of yet.
Thom @ Oct 26th 2005 9:16PM
Erick,
Yes I thought about the Samsung. One thing you can not see very well is that there is a glass shelf on top of the stand and under the Sony base that exactly fits the Sony base at 38in wide and 19" deep. The glass shelf hangs over the wooden frame by design. The Sony is secure on this stand.
I would need a new stand with the Samsung which would still get me in cheaper than the sony but then I'd have to move my setup in my house, move cable outlets etc.
I agree that the TV stand is a dubious criteria to make a decsion, but it afforded me the opportunity to try it out easily.
Thom @ Oct 26th 2005 9:18PM
Home Theater Dude,
You absolutely right about the speakers. Its probably the biggest thing that would cause me to take this set back and get something else. I wish they were removable at least.
Goose @ Oct 26th 2005 9:52PM
Thom,
I'm not sure what image is displayed if a 1080p signal is sent, say through a PS3, but i know that the HDMI chips sony used in these sets cannot accept 1080p. On AVSforum.com owners have been attempting to send a 1080p signal from a PC through both vga and hdmi. So far no one has been successful.
If you, for example, used a blue-ray player to send a 1080p signal, the player would just convert the signal to 1080i and then the TV would convert is back to 1080p.
Erick @ Oct 27th 2005 1:06AM
I don't wanna sound like I'm being picky, or putting down your choice, but if you feel safe putting that TV on your stan, I'd think you'd feel just as safe putting on the Samsung. At 75.6 pounds you'd have almost 20 less pounds on your stand, and the Sony is hanging over the edges anyway. Additionally, the Sammy is 46.5" wide, due to the speakers being on the bottom...as you know...so it would be hanging over even less...But, I may be biased with my older model 50" Sammy...great TV. Welcome to HD!
Erick @ Oct 27th 2005 1:12AM
Hey Thom, yeah, you mentioned you checked Sammy. Sony seems reasonable choice, and looking closely, I can see the glass top. You must not live in Los Angeles, as I do :-) That is SO NOT earthquake proof.
As said, not picking, it's a great set-up and I understand picking based on the shelving set-up, you have to have some criteria. Well written review. Good reading!
I don't think my 2 year old TV qualifies me to write a reader-review...maybe when I put that TV in the bed-room and upgrade the living room TV... The wife said the 50"er is looking small...can you believe it?!?
madshi @ Oct 27th 2005 2:38AM
It will show a blank screen, if being fed a 1080p signal. Unfortunately most of today's displays don't accept 1080p sources yet. This is expected to change in 2006, though. That's why I'm still waiting.
What I'm wondering is why Thom found plasma displays so expensive! I mean one of the best Plasmas available (Panasonic 50") is available for MSRP 3999 USD (online prices even lower).
Thom @ Oct 27th 2005 8:21AM
Erick,
Yes I thought about the Samsung. One thing you can not see very well is that there is a glass shelf on top of the stand and under the Sony base that exactly fits the Sony base at 38in wide and 19" deep. The glass shelf hangs over the wooden frame by design. The Sony is secure on this stand.
I would need a new stand with the Samsung which would still get me in cheaper than the sony but then I'd have to move my setup in my house, move cable outlets etc.
I agree that the TV stand is a dubious criteria to make a decsion, but it afforded me the opportunity to try it out easily.
Galley @ Oct 27th 2005 8:41AM
Congrats on the sweet TV, but there's no way I would put a TV that large and heavy on an audio rack.
Randy @ Oct 27th 2005 10:49AM
I actually bought the 60" version of this unit, based on the merits of the review that was posted here a few weeks ago. Actually I had just replaced my 34" Sony Tube HDTV with a Sharp LCD 45" and was not happy with the black levels and the price to screen size ratio was also weighing heavy on my mind. I had not cared for much of the DLP offerings that I had seen except for the Sony 3LCD versions that were out, but alas they only offered 720p. Once I saw the SXRD in action it was a no brainer, 15" more in size for the a bit less that what I had paid for the 45" and that included a 5 year service warranty in the price!
Size... HUGE, it took a few days to get used to the size of the unit, but it has started to blend in with time. The quality of the picture is STUNNING it is as good if not better than my original Sony HDTV tube screen. I could gush all day about this set....
I have had no luck either with getting a 1080p signal into the unit (not really a huge deal) I have opted for 1080i out put from HTPC and it looks just fine. I could get a 1080p signal in with the Sharp LCD i had prior but really didn't see a markable enough difference to fret over the Sony not doing it. With so little (WMV HD) content available currently it just seemed like too much future proofing ;)
If you want/can/need/wish/covet this set, I totally understand
Randy
Frank @ Oct 27th 2005 2:02PM
What good does an optical audio out from the tv do? I'm assuming its so send an audio signal that came in from the HDMI cable? Is this correct?
David @ Oct 27th 2005 2:20PM
I disagree with the opinion that these SXRD sets can not natively display a 1080p signal. A single HDMI-A (19 pin) input does not have the throughput to carry a 1080p signal, as a HDMI-B (29 pin) could. However, dual HDMI-A inputs (as present on both the SXRD sets and reportedly on the upcoming PS3) can carry the full 1080p signal natively. This setup will provide a 1080p native source through 1080p capable connection, to a 1080p capable display. Sounds good to me.
*dual DVI would provide similar results
Goose @ Oct 27th 2005 5:36PM
David,
So what you are saying is that if i hooked up both of the hdmi outputs from a ps3 into the two inputs on the sxrd i would be able to dispay a true 1080p signal. I'm not sure i completely understand because a) each hdmi on the sxrd is for a seperate video input, and b) the two hdmi outputs on the ps3 are meant to be used to form a 32:9 picture on two hdtv placed directly beside eachother.
I guess my question is: how would you tell the tv two display both of the hdmi inputs at the same time?
Goose @ Oct 27th 2005 5:37PM
Frank,
I assume it is a digital audio output, to a reciever, for someone using a cable card.
Also, i dont thing these tvs are able to send a digital audio out that was recieved through hdmi. I may be wrong on this though.
Thom @ Oct 27th 2005 5:57PM
Galley,
Its not an audio rack. Its a TV Stand. The TV on it before was heavier - it was a 36in CRT.
Thom @ Oct 27th 2005 6:04PM
madshi,
Yes I know there are good plasma's available at these prices. I was interested in getting a 1080p set with HDMI. Although, I'm now investigating whether that was worth it...
The plasmas i looked at were mostly more expensive. Some very much more.
Thom @ Oct 27th 2005 6:07PM
Goose,
I will test to see if optical audio out works via HDMI in.
Kpluck @ Oct 27th 2005 11:56PM
The manual on Sony's web site for this display clearly states the HDMI input only accepts 1080i, 720P, 480P and 480i (pg 115 under Inputs/Outputs). It sounds like a nice display but I wouldn't spend that much money on anything that didn't accept a 1080P signal over HDMI which is why I will be waiting until next year before upgrading my old RPTV.
Thom @ Oct 30th 2005 12:31AM
Goose,
The answer is no. The optical out port is only for Dolby Digital coming in thru the TV feed. Not, HDMI.
Thom @ Oct 30th 2005 12:47AM
David and Kpluck,
Yes. I saw the manual where it states input resolutions for HDMI. It does seem that this set does not have the ability to input 1080p via HDMI. I am investigating further, although I'm fairly certain at this point that is the case. If I confirm this, the set will go back. I was really intent on buying something that is a bit more future proof.
There is a longer discussion about the merits of displaying full 1080p vs deinterlacing 1080i but I'm not sure it makes sense to spend 4K on a set that won't be able to accept all the latest content 2 years from now.
Its sad because the picture is so amazing on this set when viewing HD content.
Thom @ Oct 30th 2005 1:18AM
Tom_W,
My comment about Non-HD channels being unacceptable was in reference to watching it in wide mode (streched to 16:9). It is watchable in 4:3. The Sony allows you to set a default setting for each type of content so when 4:3 content comes on, it shows it centered and HD conent fills the screen in 16:9. The quality is ok. Not as good as on a tube but ok. I'm not really sure how it compares to other HDTVs since this is my first one. I was connected via a comcast HD DVR set top box going out DVI and in HDMI to the TV.
I do have an important observation on this subject: Since I wrote the above review, I have added a cable card to the mix. Watching normal TV was better in this mode. In fact watching all channels (including HD) was better in this mode. With the cable card, the signal is direct to the TV and I assume it does all the processing rather than the set top box. There was less signal degradation and noise effects. If watch live TV, I will watch it via the TV input using the cable card. There are several advantages to this: Clearly better picture quality of Non-HD content, a better more consistent signal for HD content. For SD channels, you can also use the twin view feature to watch more than 1 channel which works out great for college football saturdays. I don't have the sound output from the TV going to my sound system right now but that would be another step to complets this setup.
For program guide and DVR capabilities (as well as On Demand and Pay per view) I use the set top box input. They can both be hooked up at the same time - you just have to setup a splitter on the cable wire.
Tom_W @ Oct 30th 2005 12:32PM
Thom,
Regarding your comment about the non-HD channel viewing being unacceptable, were you using a DVI to HDMI connection as would be available on a High Def satellite recevier? Just wondering if that makes a difference, or if that is no better than using a component connection from a non-HD recevier. I was told that since you are getting a digital signal with satellite T.V., that using the DVI out would send a true digital signal to the TV. So even with non-HD channels the picture quality should still be better. Unfortunelty when you go into a Best Buy or Circuit City, they typically only show you a DVD or HD channel, so it always looks good. Until cable and satellite companies start carrying more HD channels, most of us will be watching non-HD programming 90-95% of the time, so this becomes an important consideration before plunking down 4 grand.
David @ Oct 30th 2005 2:49PM
Goose,
Good question. Dual HDMI-A's connections (or DVI's) would be the only way to get the full 1080p signal (as proven by Kpluck's find), but if the set isn't set up to be configurable in that way, then maybe that is why people are saying it isn't really a full 1080p display. If not, that is a serious disappointment. The word 1080p isn't even mentioned in the manual at all (which may be the biggest evidence that this may be the case). Hopefully somebody can get a straight answer some day.
Tom_W @ Nov 9th 2005 7:57PM
Thom, Thanks for your response regarding the SD quality.
One last question. How would you rate the viewing angle? When I first saw this TV, it was in a Tweeter showroom, where all of the RP TV's, including the SxRD, were at eye-level when standing. Obviously they looked very good. However, when I went into the local Best Buy, their Sony SxRD was lower, on a TV stand, which dramatically affected the quality (very dark picture) until you sat down to again get at eye level. I know the vertical viewing angle on all RP's is worse than the horizontal. And it all depends on where you place the set, and how big your living room is, etc. Has this been a big issue or concern for you?