very nice compilation.
It sounds here as if progressive would be better for fast motion than interlaced. However with fast motion the number of "picture events" per second is what determines the smoothness of the motion. With the same bandwidth available an interlaced format variation will record twice as many instances than it's progressive counterpart.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Andreas Wacker @ Oct 23rd 2005 11:12AM
very nice compilation.
It sounds here as if progressive would be better for fast motion than interlaced. However with fast motion the number of "picture events" per second is what determines the smoothness of the motion. With the same bandwidth available an interlaced format variation will record twice as many instances than it's progressive counterpart.