Skip to Content
This is pretty short sighted, rather very cursory. Why don't you give the actual raster of the formats: 720p 1280x720 1080i 1920x1080 1080p " " Not to mention the differences in frame rate. Wiki does a good job for details. The HD 'spec' is a mess. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_television
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Don Huckleberry @ Oct 24th 2005 1:56AM
This is pretty short sighted, rather very cursory.
Why don't you give the actual raster of the formats:
720p 1280x720
1080i 1920x1080
1080p " "
Not to mention the differences in frame rate.
Wiki does a good job for details. The HD 'spec' is a mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_television